Objectives: The goal of the present study was to design a registration system for recording suicide in Iran, capable of designing identification pathways, registration, and report and follow-up of suicide cases and deaths due to suicide.Method: Through library assessments and surveying suicide registration systems in other countries (Denmark, India and WHO), potential methods of suicide in Iran were identified; also, potential methods of identifying suicide cases in the country were designed and finalized subsequent to group consultation.Results: Suicide registration forms were designed, using the collected data. In this system: 1- The Health and Treatment Network is considered to be the appropriate site for the collection of data related to suicide, 2- Instances of suicide deaths and suicide attempts will be completely registered, 3- Data will be gathered from treatment centers and other contributing centers in general monthly forms, 4- Mental health attendants will enter the data into the computer system each month, in the suicide registration center affiliated to the health and treatment center, 5- The system will be primarily executed in two universities, 6- Training of target group (managers and personnel) in the primary stages of execution is important.Conclusion: The launch of the system for recording suicidal behavior in the country is the first essential step in the control and prevention of suicide.

As a result of incorrect registration information, if persons who acted on the basis of this information are damaged, according to the general rules, the injured party must claim compensation for that damage by filing a lawsuit then proving the elements of civil liability. Given the difficulty of proving these elements, as well as the possibility of injurious' financial inability, will not guarantee that the injured party will be fully compensated. This result will ultimately be to the detriment of persons who have trusted and acted on the registration system. Therefore, in the legal system of Australia and then, the United Kingdom, a mechanism called Insurance Principle was created. This principle, by guaranteeing the financial value of Title lost as a result of incorrect registration information by the government, prevents the loss of public trust in the registration system and the damage to persons. This research has been written in descriptive, analytical and historical methods, also using authoritative library and electronic sources and it is examined the history of Insurance Principle in Australia and the United Kingdom, under what conditions the economic security of registered land title is guaranteed in the registration system, on what basis was it established and what will be the consequences of its realization. Also, by examining the Iranian legal system, it is observed that the Insurance Principle has not been realized in the Iranian registration system, therefore, it is proposed to the legislature to use this principle to achieve public trust in the registration system.

Death and disease information are key information in priority setting. Because importance of valid and reliable mortality data, death registration system in I.R.Iran as a multi source registration system was established and improved from 1998. In this system mortality data are collected from hospitals, health houses and health centers, forensic medicine bureau, authorized cemeteries, civil registration bureau and other probable sources in district and within a defined process data are collected in provincial health centers and then in ministry of health. For improvement of registered data some important activities have to done in different level such as continuous education and strengthening intersectoral collaboration.

The efficiency of the land registration system is affected by several components that are divided into two internal levels and specific to each legal and fundamental system. At the domestic level, these components are affected by the structure of the domestic system, especially property law, but at the basic level, the commonalities of various legal systems are studied. The question is, what are the basic components and how is it achieved? In this paper, with a comparative study in the two land registration systems of Iran and the United Kingdom, after stating the basic components of land registration, which are: Simplicity in the process of registering real estate, granting legal and economic security to real estate, complete registration of land status, accuracy in registering land information, public access to registration information, independence of land registration system, low cost of real estate registration, approach both systems were examined in realizing such components.The result shows that in both systems, all components are not strictly observed and in some cases there are shortcomings that need to be addressed.

registration institution guarantees economic and legal security. Human societies always noted this point and created several registration systems. Land title registration should be simple, reliable and well suited to the society it serves. With regard to social conditions, every society fallows from one of these systems.Iranian registration system has enough capacity to establish legal security, but doesn't overlap with owners, government, and society's interests and there are some problems and challenges that require amending registration laws. Then it must to submit exact solutions that terminate challenges about interpretation and application of registration regulations. In this thesis, among comparative perspective, is tried to determine the sort of Iranian registration system about real properties and submitted some solutions and recommendations.

Introduction: Recording the reasons of death especially its underlying causes are considered to be the most important data in modifying health-care programs of countries. Therefore, a comprehensive computer system, related databases is necessary in analyzing and understanding the main processes in health-care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the electronic death registration system in Iran based on its requirements.Methods: This was a descriptive-analytical study conducted in 2011 in 12 medical universities of Iran.The study population consisted of two groups of users and officials of the electronic death registration system in medical sciences universities of our country (n=50). The data collection Tools of this study is a researcher-constructed questionnaire based on the Likert scale, and a checklist. The questionnaire was based on 3 requirements (user requirements, general requirements, and security requirements). The checklist was designed to assess technical requirements. The validity of the questionnaire was approved by the content validity method (opinions of teachers and scholars of health information management and computer sciences). Its reliability was approved using Cronbach’s alpha. Data analysis was conducted by SPSS statistical software version 20 and descriptive statistics.Results: 84.6%, 75.7%, 40.9% of users and experts of medical sciences universities, type 1, respectively approved the existence of user, general, and security requirements.34.8%, 66.7%, and 22.7% in type 2, and 35.7%, 33.3%, and 20.7% in type 3 universities, respectively, approved the existence of user, general, and security requirements. Moreover, technical requirements are approved by 64.7% of software experts.According to these results, with a mean of 51.7% in user requirements, 58.5% general requirements, and 64.7% technical requirements the electronic death registration system is at an acceptable level. However, it is at a weak level in terms of security requirements (28.1%).Conclusion: Weak results of the security requirements show the inefficiency of this system’s software. Therefore, the Ministry of Health and Medical Education should plan to improve the performance of this software in terms of security requirements.

The sovereign nature of the registration system has included them in the public domain and run by the public sector and through civil servant. The idea of "shrinking the state" and "increasing the regulatory role of governments" has led to the idea of privatizing registries, one of the proposed ways of privatizing is to do the registrar's work with non-governmental experts: notaries. what is the nature of notaries (public, private, privately public), and with what legal bases can they delegate this state sovereignty task? This article, with a comparative and historical overview, concludes that, on the one hand, it is necessary to distinguish between the "notary profession" which is a private profession and the "notary role" which is a public role, based on this role, that is the public authority acting in the name of the state and it has a sovereign nature. On the other hand, although registration affairs are regarded as sovereign affairs, but based on the foreseeability of doing of sovereign affairs by attracting "people's participation" in laws, it is possible to extend the doing of registrar taskes by notary offices in accordance with the general policies of Article 44 of the Constitutional law.

Guaranty of security of juridical act about lands is a more important difficulties in every country. Disregarding the independence of land registration system from the system of civil law and disregarding bases and functions of land registration system has resulted in making mistakes by judicial doctrine and precedent in order to propose proper suggestions for solving the problems related to land registration system and to sanction for juridical acts about lands.Whiles presentation every solution in this scope must be proper regarding to protective bases of owner and third parties and two functional characters of the land registration system including “informing” and “protective” features.land registration systems can be divided in constitutive registration system and confirmative one. This classification means land registration in any case, has a very effective role in credit of judicial act about of land although the degree of this effect is different depending on the system.

The land registration system is a critical database that individuals rely on for information about immovable property. A key feature of an efficient database is the comprehensiveness of its information, which is equally vital in land registration systems. Ensuring comprehensive registration information has always been a concern for those overseeing land registration systems globally. Incomplete registration data can lead to discrepancies between registration information and the actual state of lands, potentially causing public distrust and various negative repercussions.Historically, land regulations have been intertwined with social considerations, presenting continual challenges for land registration systems. Social considerations often conflict with formalism and registration laws. For example, in pre-Islamic Arab societies, where literacy was uncommon, documentation alone was insufficient to prove ownership, leading to hardships in transactions. Such historical perspectives in Islamic jurisprudence, which significantly influences Iran's legal system, pose challenges to encouraging individuals to register their land.With societal development, the negative impacts of deficient registration information became more evident, including transaction instability, fraud, boundary disputes, and difficulties in implementing macro policies due to unregistered land. Efforts to overcome social considerations and ensure comprehensive registration information have become more pronounced. Notably, Theodore Burton Fox Ruoff, head of the UK Land Registry in the 1960s and 1970s, introduced the "mirror principle," aiming to make the land registration system a reflection of all facts related to immovable property.Despite procedural similarities between the land registration systems of Iran and the UK, Iran lacks a comprehensive literature on the mirror principle. The challenge of registration information deficiencies due to social considerations is common across all land registration systems, and Iran's system is no exception. This paper investigates whether Iran's land registration system has successfully achieved comprehensive registration information for immovable property. It also explores the reasons behind any successes or failures, evaluates the UK's status in ensuring comprehensive registration information through the mirror principle, and identifies UK practices that could benefit Iran's system.The research is structured into four sections: historical context and definition, theoretical basis, conditions and legal effects, and a comparative approach to the mirror principle in the UK and Iran. In the historical context and definition section, the paper delves into the evolution of land registration systems, highlighting the development of the mirror principle in the UK. The theoretical basis section examines the legal theories underpinning the mirror principle, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive and accurate information in land registration for ensuring legal certainty and protecting property rights. The conditions and legal effects section explore the practical implementation of the mirror principle, detailing the specific legal and administrative measures taken to ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the land register. This section also analyzes the legal implications of implementing the mirror principle, including the potential benefits and challenges associated with ensuring that the land register accurately reflects the current state of property rights.During these sections, the paper shows that Iran's current regulations do not fully support the realization of the mirror principle. Historically, the policy of mandatory public registration has not succeeded in encouraging landowners to register their properties due to inadequate enforcement mechanisms and the non-essential role of registration in legal transactions. Furthermore, numerous exceptions to mandatory registration in Iran present significant obstacles to achieving the mirror principle.To improve the comprehensiveness of registration information and achieve the mirror principle, several recommendations are proposed. First, the registration process should be transformed, making registration a prerequisite for any legal transactions. Non-registered deeds and informal agreements should be invalidated to enforce mandatory registration. This would provide a strong incentive for landowners to register their properties, ensuring that the land register accurately reflects the current state of property rights.Second, future reforms should aim to minimize exceptions to mandatory registration as much as possible, retaining only those exceptions where their existence is justified by critical reasons outweighing the broader goals of the registration system. By reducing the number of exceptions, the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the land register can be significantly improved, ensuring that it serves as a reliable source of information about immovable property.Achieving the mirror principle in Iran's land registration system is essential for ensuring public trust in its efficiency and protecting immovable property. The research underscores the need for regulatory reforms to address current deficiencies and adopt best practices from the UK’s system. Implementing the mirror principle would enhance the reliability of the land register, providing a clear and accurate reflection of property ownership and rights. This, in turn, would facilitate more secure and efficient property transactions, reduce the risk of disputes, and support the effective implementation of macro policies related to land management and development.In conclusion, the comprehensive implementation of the mirror principle in Iran's land registration system is crucial for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of registration information, fostering public trust, and protecting property rights. The proposed measures aim to create a robust, comprehensive registration system capable of meeting macro policies and effectively safeguarding individual property rights.